Stefania Lucia Magda1,2, Elisa Serban2
1 „Carol Davila”University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
2 Department of Cardiology, Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest,
Abstract: Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop more frequently than healthy controls cardio- and cerebro-vascular disorders. It is important to understand the mechanisms through which diabetes contributes to the development and severity of these complications. Extracellular vesicles (EV) are important mediators of cell to cell communication in several diseases, including diabetes mellitus and vascular disease. Three populations of EVs are described presently: exo-somes, microvesicles and apopototic bodies. Recent studies have shown that atherosclerotic lesions of all stages contain microvesicles. Higher levels of circulating EVs have been discovered in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors, with both pro-atherogenic and anti-atherogenic effects. Regarding cerebrovascular disease, studies have shown that exosomes, espe-cially those derived from stem cells, play an important role, preventing post-ischemic suppression. Different cell types in the heart contribute to the pathogenesis of diabetic cardiomyopathy and EV seem to be essential in the intercellular crosstalk between heart cells. According to recent research EVs could play an important role in different cardiac and cerebral rege-nerative therapies and could also be used as therapeutic vectors in cardiovascular medicine. Further large animal and human studies are necessary to validate EVs as diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Keywords: Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, cardiomyopathy.
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes mellitus is a common chronic disease all over the world, with increasing incidence and prevalence, due to contemporary lifestyle with reduced physical activity, processed food and increased obesity. A me-ta-analysis published in 2009, including studies from 91 countries, reported an estimate for 2010 of 285 million people with diabetes worldwide, with significant differences between populations and regions, and a predicted increase from 2010 to 2030 of 54%, cor-responding to an annual growth of 2.2%, nearly twice as high as the annual growth of the total world adult population1.
Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus develop more frequently than healthy controls cardiovascular disorders, including coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and diabetic cardiomyo-pathy, mainly through the chronic, damaging exposure of the vascular system to hyperglycemia2. Therefore, it is important to understand the exact mechanisms through which diabetes contributes to the develop-ment and severity of these complications.
Extracellular vesicles (EV) represent small cell-se-creted structures naturally released into the extra-cellular space by all eukaryotes and many prokaryo-tes, containing proteins, lipids, nuclear material and noncoding RNAs2. They were first described in the late 1960s and are important mediators of cell to cell communication in several diseases, including diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Most cell types can release vesicles into the interstitial space. These vesicles can be found in body fluids, both human and animal, such as blood, urine, tears and saliva, as well as in cell cultures3.
Three populations of extracellular vesicles are de-scribed presently: 1. Exosomes are the smallest, with a diameter around 30-150 nm in diameter. They are released through exocytosis after fusion of multivesi-cular bodies with the plasma membrane; 2. Microve-sicles (microparticles/ectosomes) are larger vesicles, with a diameter of 100-1000 nm, which are formed by the outward budging and scission of the extracellular membrane; 3. Apoptotic bodies are the largest subtype of microvesicles with a diameter of 1-5 μm, generated by the plasma membrane of apoptotic cells4.
Several strategies are currently available for the quantification of extracellular vesicles, the most po-pular being ultracentrifugation, among others, such as: density gradient, precipitation, field flow, chromato-graphy and affinity based capture and microfluidic te-chniques4. All available isolation methods are time in-tensive, require expensive equipment, and are limited by the fact that they do not purify specific populations of vesicles, probably due to lack of standardization of the techniques and methods4. In the last 8 years, the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles has constantly tried to update the topics of nomenclature, separation, characterization and functional analysis of EV5.
EV AND CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Recent studies have shown that atherosclerotic lesi-ons of all stages contain microvesicles6,7. Higher levels of circulating microvesicles have been discovered in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors, such as smoking8, dyslipidemia9, diabetes mellitus10 and arterial hypertension11, probably through activation or from apoptosis of different cells being exposed to a damaging stimulus.
Data extracted from in vitro studies suggest that microvesicles can have both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects, depending on different si-tuations3. Microvesicles increase the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (mainly interleukin 6 and 8) from endothelial cells and leukocytes, promoting the adhesion of monocytes to the endothelium and their migration to the atherosclerotic plaque3,12. Also, endothelial microvesicles can activate monocytes. Another effect of microvesicles is their interaction with the vascular endothelium and decreasing the NO production by endothelial cells-consequently impai-ring endothelial properties13. Endothelial microvesicles and platelet derived microvesicles increase endotheli-al permeability14. Microvesicles promote adhesion of monocytes to the endothelium by increasing endothe-lial expression of adhesion molecules15.
Various microvesicles contribute to foam cell for-mation in the atherosclerotic plaque by stimulating lipid and cholesterol formation in macrophages. Macro-phages and foam cell undergo afterwards apoptosis, forming a core of extracellular lipids. Increased mono-cytes and macrophage apoptosis contributes to incre-ased microvesicle release in the plaque. Microvesicles of monocyte and macrophage origin are the largest population of microvesicles in human atherosclerotic lesions16.
Infiltration of LDL particles in the vascular wall during the atherosclerotic process can induce the formation and release of tissue factor enriched micro-vesicles from the smooth muscle cell, microvesicles which in their turn influence smooth muscle cell pro-liferation and migration17.
Extracellular vesicles of different origins, with diffe-rent microRNA content, contribute to smooth muscle cell proliferation19.
Several studies of patients with stable coronary artery disease have reported increased levels of cir-culating microvesicles. Specifi c microvesicle subpo-pulations, especially those of endothelial origin, cha-racterized by CD 144+, CD 131+/annexin A5+, or microvesicles containing miR-199a and miR-126, are currently researched as interesting biomarkers for cardiovascular risk and mortality in these patients20-22.
Calcifications present in the atherosclerotic plaque have destabilizing effect in early lesions, favoring rup-ture, but gain a potential protective effect in advanced
lesions with heavy calcium deposits23. The calcification process is based on three mechanisms: 1. Cell apopto-sis, which releases microvesicles and necrotic debris, leading to nucleate apatite; 2. Deficiency of minerali-zation inhibitors (both tissue derived and circulating), leading to random apatite deposits; 3. An altered di-fferentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells and stem cells, leading to bone formation24. As several studies have shown, atherosclerotic plaque calcifications are associated with extracellular vesicles of endothelial, smooth muscle cell and macrophage origin.
Exposure of vascular smooth muscle cells to pro-infl ammatory cytokines can stimulate the release of exosomes which can mineralize when inhibitors of calcification are missing or not functioning25. Also, en-dothelial cells exposed to proinfl ammatory stimuli can release microvesicles rich in bone morphogenetic pro-tein 2, promoting calcifi cation in vascular smooth mus-cle cells26. Alterations in local homeostasis of calcium and phosphate lead to the formation of macrophage derived exosomes which stimulate mineralization27.
Recent studies have also noted that in humans, advanced atherosclerotic plaques have a high content of procoagulant microvesicles, originating form leuko-cytes, erythrocytes and smooth muscle cells. These microvesicles can actively initiate the coagulation cas-cade, either through the presence of tissue factor on their surface, or by exposing phosphatidylserine, whi-ch concentrates factors VII and VIIa on their outer membrane16,28.
Circulating leukocyte and platelet derived microve-sicles can affect the clotting29, but the actual magnitude of the prothrombotic effects of microvesicles in acute coronary syndromes is still under evaluation3,30.
In opposition to microvesicles, exosomes have shown antithrombotic effects. In animal studies plate-led-derived exosomes suppressed platelet aggregation and occlusive thrombosis31.
Microvesicles influence different mechanisms that lead to plaque destabilization and rupture. Intraplaque hemorrhages are produced by neovascularization ori-ginating from adventitial tissue, stimulated by plaque microvesicles, such as CD40+ vesicles of macrophage origin. Hemorrhages are also favored by leukocyte and endothelial microvesicles with fibrinolytic activity32,33.
Microvesicles can rise endothelial permeability 34 and also modulate inflammation in the plaque35, pro-moting fi brous cap rupture. Fibrous cap weakening is associated with smooth muscle cell apoptosis, indu-ced by the presence of microvesicles and exosomes, released in some pathological conditions36. Moreo-ver microvesicles can influence breakdown of matrix structural proteins through metalloproteinase (MMP) interactions3.
The final evolution of the atherosclerotic plaque is represented by plaque erosion or rupture with in situ thrombosis, clinically expressed as acute coronary syndrome3.
Circulating levels of procoagulant microvesicles are higher in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared to healthy controls or patients with stable coronary artery disease37, the origin of those microve-sicles being mostly endothelial cells, leukocytes, eryth-rocytes and platelets22,37. Circulating microvesicles al-terate endothelium dependent NO mediated vasodila-tion and endothelial microvesicles increase endothelial thrombogenicity14,38.
Circulating microvesicles have been also investiga-ted as prognostic markers in secondary prevention, in order to identify patients at high cardiovascular risk21,22. Increased levels of CD11b+/CD66+ leukocy-te derived microvesicles could be useful in identifying asymptomatic patients at high risk for plaque ruptu-re39, while CD3+/CD45+ microvesicles could identify individuals who will develop a major cardiovascular event40.
In patients with acute ST elevation myocardial in-farction, circulating microvesicles from the coronary arteries contain higher levels of oxidation specifi c epi-topes, linked to inflammatory responses involved in atherosclerosis, than microvesicles from the periphe-ral circulation41.
Circulating exosomes and microvesicles with speci-fic cardiac microRNAs, increase after coronary artery by-pass. Expression of miR-208a in circulating exoso-mes increases in patients with acute coronary syndro-mes42 and specific p-53 responsive microRNAs from plasma exosomes are predictive indicators for heart failure after myocardial infarction43.
EV AND CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE
Regarding cerebrovascular disease, especially stroke, studies have shown that exosomes, especially those derived from stem cells, play an important role in ne-urological disease, preventing post-ischemic suppres-sion. Also, exosomes might be an interesting thera-peutic resource in the field of regenerative medicine after stroke44.
After stroke, exosomes are released from brain cells and can be detected in the peripheral blood or the cerebro-spinal fluid45,46. As a response to stroke, exosomes are released also from blood cells and endothelial cells47. Circulating exosomes could therefore be useful biomarkers for stroke progression and re-covery44.
Exosome levels of cystatin C and CD 14 have been good predictors in studies of vascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease and also they have been associated to the progression of cerebral atrophy in patients with vascular disease48.
Circulating exosomes can express different mi-croRNAs in various types of cerebrovascular disea-se. Serum exosomal miR-9 and miR-124 levels are higher in patients with stroke compared to controls49. Another study has reported higher levels of miR-223 in acute ischemic stroke, correlated to stroke severity and short term outcomes50. Finally miR-199b-3p, miR 27b-3p, miR-130a-3p, mi-R 221-3- and miR-24-3p are more expressed in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis progression51.
Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells have enhanced in animal studies the restorative effects in the brain after stroke, reducing neurological impair-ment, promoting grey matter repair and white matter repair, as well as neurogenesis and reversing stroke-induced peripheral immunosuppression52-56.
Cardiovascular dysfunction has been proposed as one of the main causes of cognitive impairment in the elderly, this association being stronger in patients with diabetes mellitus57,58. In vitro studies have shown that extracellular vesicles in diabetic microvascular disease may increase the haemato-encephalic barrier perme-ability59,60.
EV AND DIABETIC CARDIOMYOPATHY (DCM)
Diabetic cardiomyopathy can be clinically defined by the presence of abnormal myocardial performance or structure in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease, hypertension, and signifi cant valvular disease. Hyperglycemia is the cornerstone of the pathogenesis, inducing stimuli that result in myocardial fibrosis and collagen deposition. These processes are generating altered myocardial relaxation and determine diastolic dysfunction on ultrasound imaging61. Over time, the progression of diabetic cardiomyopathy can lead to clinically manifest heart failure. Different cell types in the heart (such as cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, hematopoietic derived cells and fibroblast cells) contribute to the pathogenesis of DCM and several studies have shown that EV are essential in the intercellular crosstalk between heart cells2,62.
Cardiomyocyte’s derived EV are implicated in dia-betic cardiomyocyte steatosis. Higher levels of miR-1 and miR-133a were noted in EV derived from lipid loa-ded cardiomyocytes, in the serum of mice fed with a high fat diet and in the circulation of diabetic patients63.
An animal study performed in 2014 has shown that the communication between cardiomyocyte derived EV and endothelium is altered in diabetes, inducing an altered angiogenesis64.
Endothelial cell death and dysfunctional angiogene-sis are frequent in diabetes mellitus. Several microR-NA based mechanisms have been studied in order to explain vascular dysfunction in diabetes2. Hyperglyce-mia increases levels of miR-503 in the endothelium, le-ading to low endothelial cell proliferation and angioge-nesis65. Also, hyperglycemia reduces miR-126 expres-sion in extracellular vesicles derived from endothelial cell, thus impairing endothelial cell repair66. Reduced miR-126 expression in circulating EV and endothelial progenitor cells derived EV in patients with uncontrolled diabetes altered endothelial repair, increased apo-ptosis and the production of reactive oxygen species67.
Cardiac fibroblasts are important components of the fibrotic response in diabetic cardiomyopathy. A potential mediator of the pro-fibrotic action induced by hyperglycemia in the cardiac fibroblasts is miR-21*. Inhibition of miR-21* in mice with cardiac hypertrophy suppressed the myocardial thickening68. Also, a model including in vitro cellular stretch and in vivo pressure overload has induced the release of extracellular ve-sicles form cardiomyocytes enriched with angiotensin type I receptor69.
THERAPEUTIC POTENTIAL OF EV
According to results from studies from the last 5 to 10 years, extracellular vesicles could play an important role in different cardiac regenerative therapies and co-uld also be used as therapeutic vectors in cardiovas-cular medicine.
Platelet derived vesicles induce vascular endotheli-al growth factor (VEGF) dependent angiogenesis and stimulate post-ischemic revascularization after chro-nic ischemia70. Also, plasma derived exosomes activate Toll like receptor 4 on cardiomyocytes and thus protect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury71.
Mesenchymal stem cell derived extracellular vesicles could be an alternative to stem cell transplantation after myocardial ischemia, by transfer of specific microRNAs through embryonic stem cell extracellular vesicles72.
The use of extracellular vesicles as therapeutic vectors could be done through bioengineering, either by modifying the cytosolic content of the vesicles which could be transferred to the target cell in order to in-fluence cell metabolism; or by loading of extracellular vesicles with molecules to be delivered to target cells. Studies regarding the use of extracellular vesicles as therapeutic vectors in cardiovascular disease are few and are only on animal models. For example, adminis-tration of apoptotic bodies containing miR-126 decre-ased atherosclerotic plaque formation in mice73 and stimulate vascular endothelial cell repair after vascular injury66.
Different cardiovascular medications can influen-ce the level of circulating microvesicles. Antiplatelet agents (ticlopidine, abiciximab) inhibit platelet activati-on and also the release of platelet-derived microvesi-cles74-76. Antihypertensive agents (such as angiotensin receptor inhibitors, beta blockers and calcium chan-nel blockers) lower the circulating levels of platelet and monocyte derived microvesicles77. The effects of statin treatment on circulating microvesicles of pla-telet and endothelial origin are still under debate31,78. Statins and antihypertensive medication are able to modify the properties of in vivo generated endothelial microvesicles and their effect on the expression of en-dothelial adhesion molecules, inhibiting the adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells and improving endothelial function79. Exosomes from various cell types (such as embryo-nic stem cells, neural stem cells and mononuclear stem cells), have been tested as treatment for stroke in addition to mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes and showed good results in animal models of stroke, with improvement in neurological scores and reduction in lesion volume and tissue loss44, showing a promising clinical applicability regarding neurological restorative effects and meeting also important safety considerations.
CONCLUSIONS
Extracellular vesicles are vectors of biological informa-tion that could influence cardio- and cerebro-vascular disease in diabetic patients, by transferring benefi cent or negative mediators/stimuli. Also, they have strong therapeutic potential, especially regarding regenerati-ve medicine. The issue of correct isolation of extracellular vesicles from circulation, liquid biopsies and different tissue still limit current knowledge on this subject. Also, there is still little information about in vivo dynamics of extracellular vesicles. Further large cohort animal and human studies are necessary to va-lidate extracellular vesicles as diagnostic and therape-utic tools.
Acknowledgements: Grant 83/PCCDI 2018
References
1. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010;87:4– 14.
2. Gustafson D, Veitch S, Fish JE. Extracellular Vesicles as Protagonists of Diabetic Cardiovascular Pathology. Front Cardiovasc Medicine 2017; 4: 71. Doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2017.00071.
3. Boulanger CM, Loyer X, Rautou E and Amabile N. Extracellular ves-icles in coronary artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017;14:259-72.
4. Anouar H, Daskalopoulou S. Extracellular vesicles characteristics and emerging roles in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Me-tabolism.2018; 85: 213-22.
5. https://www.isev.org
6. Heusermann W, Hean J, Trojer D, et al. Exosomes surf on filopodia to enter cells at endocytic hot spots, traffic within endosomes, and are targeted to the ER. J. Cell Biol 2016; 213: 173–84.
7. Bobryshev, YV, Killingsworth, MC, Orekhov, AN. Increased shed-ding of microvesicles from intimal smooth muscle cells in athero-prone areas of the human aorta: implications for understanding of the predisease stage. Pathobiology 2013; 80: 24–31.
8. Gordon C, Gudi K, Krause A et al. Circulating endothelial micropar-ticles as a measure of early lung destruction in cigarette smokers. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2011; 184: 224–32.
9. Ferreira AC, Peter AA, Mendez AJ, et al. Postprandial hypertriglyc-eridemia increases circulating levels of endothelial cell microparti-cles. Circulation 2004; 110: 3599–603.
10. Sabatier F, Darmon P, Hugel B, et al. Type 1 and type 2 diabetic pa-tients display different patterns of cellular microparticles. Diabetes 2002; 51: 2840–45.
11. Preston RA, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, et al. Effects of severe hypertension on endothelial and platelet microparticles. Hypertension 2003; 41: 211–17.
12. Nomura S, Tandon NN, Nakamura T, et al. High-shear-stress-in-duced activation of platelets and microparticles enhances expression of cell adhesion molecules in THP1 and endothelial cells. Atheroscle-rosis 2001; 158: 277–87.
13. Boulanger CM, Scoazec A, Ebrahimian T, et al. Circulating micropar-ticles from patients with myocardial infarction cause endothelial dys-function. Circulation 2001; 104: 2649-652.
14. Edirissi H, Schock SK, Hakim AM, Thompson CS. Microparticles generated during cerebral ischemia increase the permeability of mi-crovascular endothelial barriers in vitro. Brain Res 2016: 1634: 83-93.
15. Barry OP, Practico D, Savani R, et al. Modulation of monocyte endo-thelial cell interactions by platelet microparticles. J Clin Invest 1998; 102: 136-144.
16. Leroyer AS, Isobe H, Lesèche G, et al. Cellular origins and thrombo-genic activity of microparticles isolated form human atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 772-77.
17. Brosseau C, Morissette G, Fortin J, et al. Tumor cells expressing tis-sue factor influence the migration of smooth muscle cells in a cata-lytic activity dependent way. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2009; 87: 694-701.
18. Sarkar A, Mitra S, Mehta S, et al. Monocyte derived microvesicles deliver a cell death message via encapsulated caspase 1. PloS ONE 2009; 4: e71405 Stefania Lucia Magda et al.
Extracellular vesicles and diabetic vascular pathology
19. Jansen F, Yang X, Proebsting S, et al. MicroRNA expression in cir-culating microvesicles predicts cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e001249
20. Sinning JM, Losch J, Walenta K, et al. Circulating CD 31+/Annexin V + microparticles correlate with cardiovascular outcomes. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2034-41.
21. Nozaki T, Sugiyama S, Koga H, et al. Significance of a multiple bio-marker strategy including endothelial dysfunction to improve risk stratification for cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 601-608.
22. Hsu JJ, Lim J, Tintut Y, Demer LL. Cell-matrix mechanics and pattern formation in inflammatory cardiovascular calification. Heart 2016; 102: 1710-15.
23. Otsuka F, Sakakura K, Yahagi K, et al. Has our understanding of calci-fi cation in human coronary atherosclerosis progressed? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2014; 34: 724-36.
24. Kapustin AN, Chatrou ML, Drozdov I, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell calcification is mediated by regulated exosome secretion. Circ Res 2015; 116: 1312-23.
25. Buendia P, Montes de Oca A, Madueño JA, et al. Endothelial mi-croparticles mediate inflammation induced vascular calcification. FASEB J 2015; 29: 173-81.
26. New SEP, Aikawa E. Role of extracellular vesicles in de novo miner-alization, an additional novel mechanism of cardiovascular calcifica-tion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33: 1753-58.
27. Mallat Z, Hugel B, Ohan J, et al. Shed membrane microparticles with procoagulant potential in human atherosclerotic plaque: a role for apoptosis in plaque thrombogenicity. Circulation 1999; 99: 348-53.
28. Falati S, Liu Q, Gross P, et al. Accumulation of tissue factor into developing thrombi in vivo is dependent upon microparticle P se-lectin glycoprotein ligand 1 and platelet P selectin. J Exp Med 2003; 197:1585-98.
29. Suades R, Padro T, Vilahur G, Badimon L. Circulating and plateled derived microparticles in human blood enhance thrombosis on ath-erosclerotic plaques. Thromb Haemost 2012; 108: 1208-19.
30. Srikanthan S, Li W, Silverstein Rl, McIntyre TM. Exosome poly-ubiq-uitin inhibits platelet activation, downregulates CD 36 and inhibits pro-atherothrombotic cellular functions. J Thromb Haemost 2014: 12:1906-17.
31. Leroyer AS, Rautou PE, Silvestre JS, et al. CD 40 ligand+ micropar-ticles from human atherosclerotic plaque stimulate endothelial pro-liferation and angiogenesis: a potential mechanism for intraplaque neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 1302-11.
32. Lacroix R, Sabatier F, Mialhe A, et al. Activation of plasminogen into plasmin at the surface of endothelial microparticles: a mechanism that modulates angiogenic properties of endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. Blood 2007; 110: 2432-439.
33. Marcos-Ramior B, Garcia Weber D, Millan J. TNF induced endo-thelial barrier disruption: beyond actin and Rho. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112:1088-102.
34. Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, et al. Update on acute coronary syn-dromes, the pathologist’s view. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 719-28.
35. Janiszewski M, Do Carmo AO, Pedro MA, et al. Platelet derived exo-sosmes of septic individuals posess propatoptotic NAD(P)H oxidase activity: a novel vascular redox pathway. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 818-25.
36. Bernal-Mizrachi L, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, et al. High levels of circulating en-dothelial microparticles in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 962-70.
37. Abbas M, Jesel L, Auger C, et al. Endothelial microparticles from acute coronary syndrome patients induce premature coronary ar-tery endothelial cells ageing and thrombogenicity: role of the Ang II/ AT1 receptor/NADPH oxidase-mediated activation of MAPKs and P13 kinase pathways. Circulation 2016; 135:280-96.
38. Sarlon-Bartoli G, Bennis I, Lacroix R, et al. Plasmatic level of leu-kocyte derived microparticles is associated with unstable plaque in asymptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 1436-441. Romanian Journal of Cardiology Vol. 29, No. 1, 2019
39. Chiva-Banch G, Suades R, Crespo J, et al. CD3+/CD45+ and SMA alpha+ circulating microparticles are increased in individuals at high cardiovascular risk who will develop a major cardiovascular event. Int J Cardiol 2016: 208: 147-49.
40. Bi S, Wang C, Jin Y, et al. Correlation between serum exosome de-rived miR-208a and acute coronary syndrome. Int J. Clin. Exp. Med 2015; 8: 4275-80
41. Matusmoto S, Sakata Y, Suna S, et al. Circulating p-53 responsive mi-croRNAs are predictive indicators for heart failure after myocardial infarction. Circ Res 2013; 113: 322-26.
42. Ortega-Otero L, Laso-Garcia F, Gomez-de Frutos MC, et al. Role of exosomes as a treatment and potential biomarker for stroke. Transl Stroke Res 2018 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s12975-018-0654-7
43. Fruhbeis C, Frohlich D, KuoWP, Kramer-Albers EM. Extracellular vesicles as mediators of neuron-glia communication. Front Cell Neu-rosci. 2013; 7: 182.
44. Zhuang X, Xiang X, Grizzle W, et al. Treatment of brain inflamma-tory diseases by delivering exosome encapsulated anti-inflammatory drugs from the nasal region to the brain. Mol Ther. 2011;19:1769– 79.
45. Kanninen KM, Bister N, Koistinaho J, Malm T. Exosomes as new diagnostic tools in CNS diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016 1862:403–10.
46. Kanhai DA, de Kleijn DPV, Kappelle LJ, et al. Extracellular vesicle protein levels are related to brain atrophy and cerebral white mat-ter lesions in patients with manifest vascular disease: the SMART-MR study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:3824.
47. Ji Q, Ji Y, Peng J, et al. Increased brain-specific MiR-9 and MiR- 124 in the serum exosomes of acute ischemic stroke patients. PLoS One. 2016;11:163645.
48. Chen Y, Song Y, Huang J, et al. Increased circulating exosomal miR-NA-223 is associated with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2017;27:57; doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00057.
49. Dolz S, Górriz D, Tembl JI, et al. Circulating microRNAs as novel biomarkers of stenosis progression in asymptomatic carotid steno-sis. Stroke. 2017;48:10–6.
50. Doeppner TR, Herz J, Gorgens A, et al. Extracellular vesicles im-prove post-stroke neuroregeneration and prevent postischemic im-munosuppression. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4:1131–43.
51. Xin H, Li Y, Cui Y, Yang JJ, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Systemic adminis-tration of exosomes released from mesenchymal stromal cells pro-mote functional recovery and neurovascular plasticity after stroke in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013; 33:1711–5.
52. Otero-Ortega L, Gómez de Frutos MC, Laso-García F. et al. Exo-somes promote restoration after an experimental animal model of intracerebral haemorrhage. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2018; 38: 767-79.
53. Otero-Ortega L, Laso-Garcia F, Gomez-de Frutos MC, et al. White matter repair after extracellular vesicles administration in an experi-mental animal model of subcortical stroke. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44433.
54. Chen KH, Chen CH,Wallace CG, Yuen CM, Kao GS, Chen YL, et al. Intravenous administration of xenogenic adipose-derived mesenchy-mal stem cells (ADMSC) and ADMSC-derived exosomes markedly reduced brain infarct volume and preserved neurological function in rat after acute ischemic stroke. Oncotarget 2016;7: 74537–56.
55. Roman GC. Vascular dementia may be the most common form of dementia in the elderly. J Neurol Sci 2002; 203-204: 7–10.
56. Vogels RL, Scheltens P, Schroeder-Tanka JM, Weinstein HC. Cogni-tive impairment in heart failure: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Heart Fail 2007; 9:440–9.
57. Beltramo E, Lopatina T, Berrone E, et al. Extracellular vesicles de-rived from mesenchymal stem cells induce features of diabetic reti-nopathy in vitro. Acta Diabetol 2014; 51:1055. doi:10.1007/ s00592-014-0672-1 106
58. Andras IE, Toborek M. Extracellular vesicles of the blood-brain bar-rier. Tissue Barriers 2016; 4:e1131804. doi:10.1080/21688370.2015. 1131804
59. Aneja A, Tang WH, Bansilal S, et al. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: in-sights into pathogenesis, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic op-tions. Am J Med. 2008;121:748–757.6 Romanian Journal of Cardiology Vol. 29, No. 1, 2019
60. Sluijter JP, Verhage V, Deddens JC, et al. Microvesicles and exo-somes for intracardiac communication. Cardiovasc Res 2014; 102: 302–11.
61. De Gonzalo-Calvo D, van der Meer RW, Rijzewijk LJ, et al. Serum microRNA-1 and microRNA-133a levels reflect myocardial steatosis in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep 2017; 7:47. doi:10.1038/ s41598-017-00070-6.
62. Wang X, Huang W, Liu G, et al. Cardiomyocytes mediate anti-an-giogenesis in type 2 diabetic rats through the exosomal transfer of miR-320 into endothelial cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2014; 74:139–50.
63. Caporali A, Meloni M, Vollenkle C, et al. Deregulation of microR-NA-503 contributes to diabetes mellitus-induced impairment of en-dothelial function and reparative angiogenesis after limb ischemia. Circulation 2011; 123:282–91.
64. Jansen F, Yang X, Hoelscher M, Cattelan A, et al. Endothelial mic-roparticle-mediated transfer of microRNA-126 promotes vascular endothelial cell repair via SPRED1 and is abrogated in glucose- damaged endothelial microparticles. Circulation 2013;128: 2026–38.
65. Wu K, Yang Y, Zhong Y, et al. The effects of microvesicles on endo-thelial progenitor cells are compromised in type 2 diabetic patients via downregulation of the miR-126/VEGFR2 pathway. Am J Physiol 2016; 310:E828–37.
66. Bang C, Batkai S, Dangwal S, etal. Cardiac fibroblast-derived microR-NA passenger strand-enriched exosomes mediate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Clin Invest 2014; 124:2136–46.
67. Pironti G, Strachan RT, Abraham D, et al. Circulating exosomes in-duced by cardiac pressure overload contain functional angiotensin II type 1 receptors. Circulation 2015; 131:2120–30.
68. Brill A, Dashevsky O, Rivo J, Gozal Y, Varon D. Platelet derived mi-croparticles induce angiogenesis and stimulate post-ischemic revas-cularization. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 67: 30-38.
Stefania Lucia Magda et al. Extracellular vesicles and diabetic vascular pathology
69. Vicencio JM, Yellon DM, Sivaraman V, et al. Plasma exosomes pro-tect the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 1525-36.
70. Ratajczak M, Ratajczak J. Horizontal transfer of RNA and proteins between cells by extracellular vesicles: 14 years later. Clin Transl Med 2016; 5:7.
71. Zernecke A, Bidzhekov K, Noels H, et al. Delivery of microRNA-126 by apoptotic bodies induces CXCL 12-dependent vascular protec-tion. Sci Signal 2009; 2: ra81.
72. Goto S, Tamura N, Li M et al. Different effects of various antiGP IIb-IIIa agents on shear induced platelet activation and expression of procoagulant activity. J Thromb. Haemost 2003; 1: 2022-30.
73. Shouzu A, Nomura S, Seitaro O, et al. Effect of ticlopidine on mono-cyte derived microparticles and activated platelet markers in diabe-tes mellitus. Clin Appl Thromb, Haemost 2004; 10: 167-73.
74. Kagawa K, Nomura S, Nagahama M, et al. Effect of ticlopidine on platelet derived microparticles in patients with connective tissue dis-ease. Haemostasis 1999; 29: 255-61.
75. Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, et al. Benidipine improves oxidized LDL-dependent monocyte and endothelial dysfunction in hyperten-sive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19: 551-57.
76. Huang B, Cheng Y, Xie Q, et al. Effects of 40 mg vs 10 mg of Atorvas-tatin on oxidized low density lipoprotein, high sensitivity C reactive protein, circulating endothelial derived microparticles and endothe-lial progenitor cells in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol 2012; 35: 125-30
77. Zu L, Ren C, Bing P, et al. Endothelial microparticles after antihyper-tensive and lipid lowering therapy inhibit the adhesion of monocytes to endothelial cells. Int J Cardiol 2015 202: 756-59.