Cognitive assessments in patients with implantable cardiac pacemaker

Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.47803/rjc.2020.30.1.43


Alexandru Martis1,2, Dumitru Zdrenghea1,2, Gabriel Gusetu1,2, Gabriel Cismaru1,2, Bogdan Dutu1,2, Gelu Simu1,2, Dana Pop1,2


1 Department of Cardiology, Rehabilitation Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2 „Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania


Abstract: Background/aim – Bradyarrhythmias cause low cerebral blood flow and imbalance of the cerebral autore-gulation, favoring neuronal ischemia and cognitive dysfunction. The main treatment in bradyarrhythmia is pacemaker (PM) implantation, which keeps the heart rate in normal range and increase cardiac output. The present study proposed the cognitive evaluation of PM group patients and a control group (CG), but with similar cardiovascular risk factors. Cognitive assessment has been achieved by applying the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Clock-Drawing Test (CDT) and Mini-Clock for both groups. Materials and methods – Observational study, performed on 40 patients divided into 2 groups (PM group and control group). Patients were investigated for the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, and echocardi-ographic assessment. Cognitive evaluation was performed in all patients by applying the MMSE and Clock-Drawing Test for better accuracy in detecting cognitive impairments related to visual-spatial skills. CDT was scored based on Rolueau scoring system. Also we calculated the Mini-Clock Score defi ned as sum of MMSE and CDT. Results – Patients with car-diac pacemaker presented lower cognitive scores. Median MMSE score was 27.3 for PM group vs. 29.3, p value <0.0005, CDT scores was 7.35 vs. 8.65, p value 0.045, and for Mini-Clock score was 35.4 vs. 38.2, p value 0.0019, compared to the control group. MMSE score was reduced especially in terms of short-term memory function (p<0.0004), attention and cal-culation (p<0.004) in comparison with the control group. Also, we noticed the presence of moderate positive correlation between the MMSE score and CDT score. Conclusion – The results of the study reveal that pacemaker patients presented statistically significant lower MMSE scores, CDT scores and Mini-Clock compared to the control group. MMSE combined with CDT proves to be fast and easy screening examination which can be helpful in detecting mild cognitive impairments in patients with implantable pacemaker. Keywords: MMSE, Clock-drawing Test, Mini-Clock, pacemaker, bradyarrhythmia.

Rezumat: Bradiaritmiile reprezintă un factor de risc în dezvoltarea disfuncţiei cognitive şi ulterior apariţia demenţei. Abordarea terapeutică a bradiaritmiilor simptomatice constă în terapia prin pacemaker. Prezentul studiu şi-a propus eva-luarea cognitivă a pacienţilor purtători de pacemaker şi a unui grup de subiecţi fără istoric de bradiaritmii dar cu factori de risc cardiovasculari similari. Testările cognitive utilizate au fost Mini-Mental State Examination, Testul ceasului, respectiv evaluarea Mini-Clock. În urma evaluărilor cognitive şi a analizei statistice s-au observat performanţe cognitive mai scăzute la pacienţii purtători de pacemaker comparativ cu grupul control. Scorurile obţinute sugerează prezenţa disfuncţiei cogntive la această categorie de pacienţi, în special disfuncţii legate de capacitatea de calcul şi memoria de scurtă durată. Cuvinte cheie: MMSE, Testul Ceasului, Mini-Clock, pacemaker, bradiaritmii.

1. INTRODUCTION
Cognition is the superior cortical function that gene-rates mental processes involved in knowledge (attenti-on, perception, memory, reasoning) and the outcome of these processes (associations, images, knowledge, conceptions).
Cognition includes several functions including short / long-term memory, attention, working memory, executive function, psychomotor speed, speech, visual and spatial ability, functions that can be measured by various neuropsychological tests. Deterioration of any of these functions is defined as cognitive dysfunction or cognitive impairment1.
Cognitive decline is often a disregarded subject in clinical activity, very often the patient remain undia-gnosed and untreated. This status is seen like a pre-dementia stage where one or more cognitive domains are affected like memory, executive function, langua-ge, visuospatial skills, but without affecting the functi-onal abilities. The most common cognitive impairment encountered is memory loss2.
Factors like hypertension, dyslipidemia, stroke, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, heart failure as well as bra-dyarrythmias are considered to be independent risk factors in development of cognitive decline and de-mentia. Thus, association of 3 or more cardiovascular risk factors increases the risk of dementia by 3.4 times compared to those without risk factors3,4.
From the physiological point of view, cerebral blood flow and blood-brain barrier play a leading role in preserving cognitive function. Most patients with bradyarrhythmias develop intermittent cerebral hypoperfusion which causes local ischemia and injury. There is also the hypothesis of low clearance of amy-loid beta precursor protein due to low cerebral flow, that causes it to accumulate in the neuronal cell and favours apoptosis and the occurrence of cognitive dys-function5.
There are some studies which suggest that pati-ents with bradyarrhythmias may develop intellectual decline and that pacemaker therapy may have some benefits in prevention. However, the results are not conclusive, and sometimes in contradiction1,6,7.
First observations regarding development of chro-nic encephalopathy in subjects with bradyarrhythmias were formulated in 1965, observing an improvement in neurological symptoms after pacemaker implan-tation8. Since then, there have been few studies that proposed cognitive assessment in this category of pa-tients. We found only 2 studies that assess cogniti-ve function using the MMSE scale, and no study using CDT evaluation6,9.
Based on the literature findings, our study goal was evaluation of cognitive function in pacemaker patients using the MMSE, CDT, and mini-Clock, in comparison with a control group with similar cardiovascular risk factors other than history of bradyarrhythmias.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
This is an observational study performed on a group of 40 patients divided in 2 equal groups, the pacemaker group and control group, admitted to the Cardiology Department of the Rehabilitation Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. For the pacemaker group we enrolled all the subjects which were admitted to our depart-ment with indication for pacemaker implantation in a limited period of time, between January 9 and March 11 2019. The control group was selected randomly from the same department hospitalized for other car-diovascular diseases other than bradyarrhythmias.
Cognitive evaluation was performed by a single blin-ded investigator without knowing whether or not the patient is wearing a pacemaker. The cognitive scales applied to all patients were Mini Mental State Exami-nation (MMSE) and Clock-Drawing Test. Finally we calculated the Mini-Clock score based on the results of the other two scores.
The MMSE examination is composed by several sec-tions aimed for assessing cognitive function related to temporo-spatial orientation, naming / identifying ob-jects, short-term memory, attention and calculation, language, giving a total score of 30 points, of which 10 points for temporo-spatial orientation, 3 points for short-term memory, attention and calculation 5 points, language 4 points, executive function and wri-ting 5 points, identification 3 points.
Clock Drawing Test is the second neuropsychome-tric instrument which was applied to population studi-ed. The subject must draw a clock face with numbers, and also must draw the hands of the clock face which should indicate a specific time. In our study we asked patient to indicate eleven o’clock and ten minutes. For quantitative evaluation of the test in the literature, there are no less than 15 scoring models. We used for scoring a revised scale used by Rouleau et al. The scale has a total score of 10 points, of which up to 2 points are awarded for integrity of the clock, 4 points for number sequence of the clock, 4 points for correct placement of the hands on the clock face.
After we gathered the score from MMSE and CDT, we calculated the mini-Clock resulting from the amount of MMSE and CDT score, with a maximum points of 40. The advantage of calculating this score was in increasing the specificity and sensitivity in de-tection of mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
Cognitive tests were performed in all patients placed in an appropriate and comfortable environment, with the purpose of achieving objective evaluation.
Also all patients underwent echocardiography and were assessed for cardiovascular risk factors (presen-ce of diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, dyslipi-demia, heart failure). Regarding LVEF there were 4 ca-tegories: subjects with preserved EF (≥50%), mild impairment FE (45-50%), moderate impairment (30-45%) and severe impairment (≤30%). The lipid profile evalu-ation consisted in: hypercholesterolemia being defined as total cholesterol >190 mg/dl, hypertriglyceridemia >150 mg/dl, low levels of HDL-cholesterol <40 mg/dl, elevated levels of LDL-cholesterol >115 mg/dL.
Exclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with neurological or psychiatric disorders (mental retar-dation, depression, psychotic disorders, documented dementia) as well as subjects using benzodiazepines, barbiturates, antipsychotics or anticholinesterases, as they may have an impact on cognitive function. Another exclusion criterion was level of education below 8 years, respectively patients who achieved an MMSE score <20 points.
Data collection and statistical analysis were performed using Excel 2007 and SPSS 22. Tests used for analytical statistics were F-Test Two Sample for Va-riances, T-Test Two-Sample Assuming Equal/Unequal Variances, Chi_Square, Pearson correlation. p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

3. RESULTS
General characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. Regarding pacemaker implantation, 70% of the patients received a pacemaker one year ago, 20% in the last 12 months not less than 3 months ago, and 10% received 24 months ago. Pacing mode was VVI for 55% of subjects, respectively DDD mode for 45%. 50% of the patients were treated by pacemaker implantati-on for sinus node disease, 15% for complete AV block, and 35% for AV block grade 2 type 2. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was normal for 65% of the pa-tients, 15% presented mild impairment, 10% moderate impairment, and 10% were with severe impairment. LVEF in the control group was in 70% of cases normal, 15% of cases presented mild impairment, 5% modera-te impairment and 10% severe impairment.
Using statistical analysis (Chi-Square Test) we found no statistical differences related to sex, presence of diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, between pa-cemaker group and control group. Applying T-Test we found no statistical differences regarding age, level of total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and no statistical differences related to ejection fraction of left ventricle between the two groups.
There was also no statistical differences related to years of education between groups.
MMSE score in the pacemaker group was signifi-cantly lower compared to the control group, with a mean difference of 2 points between the studied groups. The score related to short-term memory, was significantly lower in the pacemaker group compared to the control group (p = 0.00044) with a mean score of 1.95 vs. 2.68 points. Also the score for attention and calculation was more reduced in the pacemaker group (p=0.004) with a mean score of 3.67 vs. 4.63 points in comparison with patients from control group.
Regarding Clock-Drawing Test, we noticed that the score in the pacemaker group was significantly lower, compared to control group (7.35 vs. 8.65 points).
The differences between groups studied were even higher after calculating the mini-Clock score (35.4 vs. 38.2 points) (Table 2).
As expected we also found a positive moderate correlation between CDT score and MMSE score (Pearson Correlation Coeffi cient R2= 0.3604).

4. DISCUSSION
Main findings in the present study were that patients with implantable cardiac pacemaker had lower scores for the MMSE, CDT, Mini-Clock assessments, compa-red to control group. The cut-off values for cognitive assessments which we used in our study depends on a number of several factors such as level of education and age.
Some studies define a cut-off score for MMSE of 24 for the diagnosis of dementia. The cut-off is arbitrarily chosen, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 87%, a 55% positive predictive value and 97% nega-tive predictive value, mentioning that the majority of cut-offs have the sensitivity higher than the specificity because MMSE remain a mental screening instrument. Even so, normal scoring, does not rule out the absen-ce of dementia, that’s way at least two cognitive tests should be used for evaluation10,11.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defi ned below a cut-off point of 27 or 28, having a a sensitivity of 45 to 60% and specificity of 65 to 90%. However these cut-offs are more indicative and should not represent fixed cut-offs in diagnosis of MCI. In our study the me-dian MMSE score was 27.3 points, above the cut-off for dementia diagnosis, but reaching the cut-off for MCI2,12,13.
Cut-off values for Clock Drawing Test is 8 points according to Aprahaian et al., with a sensitivity 76.2% and a specificity 69.7%. In our study the median score for pacemaker group was 7.35 points, again below the normal values.
Combination of CDT with MMSE (Mini-Clock Test) is a valid tool with a better sensitivity and specificity in comparison with MMSE or CDT used alone. The sen-sitivity is 76.2% and specificity is 77.3% using a cut-off of 36 points. It is a useful test in discriminating patients with MCI versus controls and rule out mild cognitive impairment. The mean score for Mini-Clock in our study was 35.4 points for the pacemaker group, and 38.2 points in the control group which again indicate that MCI may be more common in the patients with implantable pacemaker14,15.
The current guidelines do not recommend routine use of neuroimaging test for positive diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, often is necessary only the signs of impairments in different cognitive domains. Once the MCI is present, the annual rate conversion to de-mentia is very high, ranging from 6 to 25% depending on the population studied2,16.
Another study worth of mentioning is a cohort study conducted on 16245 participants which con-clude that patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment carrying a 1.8 greater risk of having a pa-cemaker, compared to general population. These fi n-dings indicate that subjects with a history of bradyar-rhytmia are more prone to develop over time cogniti-ve dysfunction, due to neuronal injury17,18.
Our study limitation is the absence of cognitive assessment before pacemaker implantation, and redu-ced number of subjects. Based on this limitation we cannot establish the influence of pacemaker therapy in the population studied.
In light of these data, we draw attention to the fact that there is a close connection between the presen-ce of cognitive impairments and pacemaker patients. Furthermore, we suggest that brain injury in this cate-gory of patients occurs long before pacemaker implan-tation, and at the time of implanting, patients are in an advanced stage of bradyarrhythmia often associated with multiple syncope episodes.
Unfortunately therapeutic and primary prevention strategies for dementia subjects are limited, and need further investigation. Prevention of dementia begins with early control of cardiovascular risk factors and early treatment of associated cardiovascular diseases such as bradyarrhythmias.

5. CONCLUSIONS
Pacemaker patients have lower MMSE, CDT, Mini-Clock scores, when compared to control group, pri-marily with reduced scores in short-term memory, at-tention and calculation. Mini Mental State Examination scale combined with Clock-Drawing test is a fast and easy screening examination which might be helpful in detecting cognitive dysfunctions even in pacemaker patients.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References 
1. Proietti R, Manzoni GM, Pietrabissa G, Castelnuovo G, editors. Psy-chological, Emotional, Social and Cognitive Aspects of Implantable Cardiac Devices. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
2. Langa KM, Levine DA. The Diagnosis and Management of Mild Cog-nitive Impairment: A Clinical Review. JAMA. 2014 Dec 17;312(23): 2551–61.
3. Sahathevan R, Brodtmann A, Donnan GA. Dementia, stroke, and vascular risk factors; a review. Int J Stroke Off J Int Stroke Soc. 2012 Jan;7(1):61–73.
4. Antón Jiménez M, González Guerrero JL. [Disorders associated with mild cognitive impairment. Risk factors and predictors]. Rev Espa-nola Geriatr Gerontol. 2017 Jun;52 Suppl 1:20–3.
5. de la Torre JC. Cardiovascular Risk Factors Promote Brain Hypo-perfusion Leading to Cognitive Decline and Dementia. Cardiovasc Psychiatry Neurol. 2012.
6. Barbe C, Puisieux F, Jansens I, Dewailly P, Klug D, Kacet S, et al. Improvement of Cognitive Function after Pacemaker Implantation in Very Old Persons with Bradycardia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 May 8;50(4):778–80.
7. Koide H, Kobayashi S, Kitani M, Tsunematsu T, Nakazawa Y. Im-provement of cerebral blood flow and cognitive function following pacemaker implantation in patients with bradycardia. Gerontology. 1994;40(5):279–85.
8. Dalessio DJ, Benchimol A. Chronic Encefalopathy related to heart block; Its correction by permanent cardiac pacemaker. Neurology. 1965 May;15:499-503.
9. Jabourian AP. [Cognitive functions, EEG and gait disorders in cardiac arrhythmias, one day before and eight days after pacemaker implantation]. Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1995 Feb;153(2):89–105.
10. Kochhann R, Varela JS, Lisboa CS de M, Chaves MLF. The Mini Men-tal State Examination: Review of cutoff points adjusted for school-ing in a large Southern Brazilian sample. Dement Neuropsychol. 2010;4(1):35–41.
11. Votruba KL, Persad C, Giordani B. Cognitive Deficits in Healthy El-derly Population With “Normal” Scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2016 May;29(3):126–32.
12. Lin JS, O’Connor E, Rossom RC, Perdue LA, Burda BU, Thompson M, et al. Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rock-ville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013. (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews).
13. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Al-zheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement J Alzheimers Assoc. 2011 May 1;7(3):270–9.
14. Cacho J, Benito-León J, García-García R, Fernández-Calvo B, Vicen-te-Villardón JL, Mitchell AJ. Does the Combination of the MMSE and Clock Drawing Test (Mini-Clock) Improve the Detection of Mild Al-zheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment? J Alzheimers Dis. 2010 Nov 25;22(3):889–96.
15. Heinik J, Solomesh I, Bleich A, Berkman P. Are the clock-drawing test and the MMSE combined interchangeable with CAMCOG as a dementia evaluation instrument in a specialized outpatient setting? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2003 Jun;16(2):74–9.
16. The Sensitivity and Specifi city of Subjective Memory Complaints and the Subjective Memory Rating Scale, Deterioration Cognitive Ob-servee, Mini-Mental State Examination, Six-Item Screener and Clock Drawing Test in Dementia Screening
17. Fowler NR, Johnson KG, Li J, Moore CG, Saba S, Lopez OL, et al. Use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1514–6.
18. Ogoh S. Relationship between cognitive function and regulation of cerebral blood flow. J Physiol Sci JPS. 2017 May;67(3):345–51.

ISSN
ISSN – online: 2734 – 6382
ISSN-L 1220-658X
ISSN – print: 1220-658X
INDEXING
The Romanian Journal of Cardiology is indexed by:
SCOPUS
EBSCO
ESC search engine
DOAJ
CNCSIS B+
CODE: 379
CME Credits: 10 (Romanian College of Physicians)
LICENSE